10. Results-Driven Contracting

10.1: There is a statewide policy (law, administrative rule or policy, executive order, etc) that encourages results-focused contracts and/or active contract management

10.2: The state has a policy (law, administrative rule or guidance, executive order, etc) that requires procurement contracts to, wherever practicable, prioritize proposals that meet the needs of communities most in need.

Maryland

Leading Example

In 2024, Maryland launched major procurement reforms to strengthen accountability and equity in how state contracts are managed. Governor Moore’s executive order established a centralized platform and modernized processes to improve contract oversight, performance tracking, and transparency across agencies. These changes help ensure that state dollars are used effectively and deliver meaningful results for Marylanders. At the same time, the reforms embed equity into procurement by directing agencies to set socioeconomic participation goals and prioritize proposals that expand opportunities for small, disadvantaged, and minority-owned businesses. By tying procurement decisions more closely to community impact, Maryland is working to make state contracting both more efficient and more responsive to residents who have historically faced barriers to opportunity.

Promising Examples

Colorado

Colorado

Connecticut

Connecticut

Delaware

Delaware

Ohio

Ohio

Rhode Island

Rhode Island

Utah

Utah

Washington

Washington